Dear Cerberus X User!
As we prepare to transition the forum ownership from Mike to Phil (TripleHead GmbH), we need your explicit consent to transfer your user data in accordance with our amended Terms and Rules in order to be compliant with data protection laws.
Please read the new Terms and Rules below, check the box to agree, and click "Accept" to continue enjoying your Cerberus X Forum experience. The deadline for consent is April 5, 2024.
Do not accept the amended Terms and Rules if you do not wish your personal data to be transferred to the future forum owner!
Accepting ensures:
- Continued access to your account with a short break for the actual transfer.
- Retention of your data under the same terms.
Without consent:
- You don't have further access to your forum user account.
- Your account and personal data will be deleted after April 5, 2024.
- Public posts remain, but usernames indicating real identity will be anonymized. If you disagree with a fictitious name you have the option to contact us so we can find a name that is acceptable to you.
We hope to keep you in our community and see you on the forum soon!
All the best
Your Cerberus X Team
<pre>
Print "Hello World"
</pre>
<pre>
Print "That's how you concatenate "+2+" strings"
</pre>
Print "Hello World"
</pre>
<pre>
Print "That's how you concatenate "+2+" strings"
Mmmh, my framework fantomCX does just that. And for each pre section there is a code file build.Just to be clear: That's a hypothetical question - no Cerberus X documentation .cerberusdoc file actually contains multiple pre blocks.
Thanks Paul.
Code:Print "That's how you concatenate "+2+" strings"
What do you think?
Print "This is how you join" + " two strings"
my framework fantomCX does just that
I'm talking of multiple <pre> blocks in one single "Example:" section. That's nowhere to be found. Not even in your Framework - I just checked it: all 56 <pre> blocks are in a separate "Example:" section.
Who would do that? I fail to see a purpose right now.
Just needs those two word added I thinkI can note that for a future update. Is the former sentence too unclear or is the wording not correct?
Done!I can note that for a future update.
That's a new feature meant to anti-frustrate: In the case of Compare, the old doccer just took you to one of those 16 entries. You can imagine how high the chances were that you were shown the correct one. The new doccer takes you to the index, where you can select the right entry. That's also why below the method/function name the scope is shown, so you find the corresponding one easily. Same goes for every method/function that has multiple possible meanings. Identifiers that are unique still take you to the right page immediately.