• Dear Cerberus X User!

    As we prepare to transition the forum ownership from Mike to Phil (TripleHead GmbH), we need your explicit consent to transfer your user data in accordance with our amended Terms and Rules in order to be compliant with data protection laws.

    Important: If you accept the amended Terms and Rules, you agree to the transfer of your user data to the future forum owner!

    Please read the new Terms and Rules below, check the box to agree, and click "Accept" to continue enjoying your Cerberus X Forum experience. The deadline for consent is April 5, 2024.

    Do not accept the amended Terms and Rules if you do not wish your personal data to be transferred to the future forum owner!

    Accepting ensures:

    - Continued access to your account with a short break for the actual transfer.

    - Retention of your data under the same terms.

    Without consent:

    - You don't have further access to your forum user account.

    - Your account and personal data will be deleted after April 5, 2024.

    - Public posts remain, but usernames indicating real identity will be anonymized. If you disagree with a fictitious name you have the option to contact us so we can find a name that is acceptable to you.

    We hope to keep you in our community and see you on the forum soon!

    All the best

    Your Cerberus X Team

Suggestion Generic 2d/3d vectors?

Holzchopf

Well-known member
3rd Party Module Dev
Tutorial Author
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
500
Hi there

Have you ever had the need for "primitive" vectors being passed to or from functions and didn't want to pass them as arrays? Well I did. Crazy me ^_^ And for that I wrote classes like...

Cerberus:
Class VecXY<T>
    Field x:T, y:T

    Method New(pX:T, pY:T)
        x = pX
        y = pY
    End
End

... and I thought "maybe others use similar types to this and everyone is just writing the same code over and over again?"

Would it make sense to provide them as a standard feature in CX? I don't know if it even makes sense performance-wise (e.g. is accessing a member worse than indexing an array).

Cheers
 
Back
Top Bottom